thanks Scott, do you also forsee the possibility of, rather than
changing existing profiles to address use of a new extension, the
definition of new profiles that extend an existing profile in order to
do so?
paul
Scott Cantor wrote:
>>Scott, your extensions doc [1] states
>>
>>/In addition, specific profiles MAY define additional requirements or
>>processing rules related to protocol extensions, if the desired profile
>>behavior cannot be derived through a reasonable composition of the
>>two
>>/
>>What are the 'two' in '... composition of the two' above. Requirements
>>and processing rules as defined by the extension itself?
>>
>>
>
>It refers to "the protocol extension" and "the profile". It's a weasel
>sentence intended to enable a protocol extension to be applied across
>profiles without every profile having to retroactively change to reference
>the extension unless there are specific considerations that modify the
>profile.
>
>-- Scott
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
>
--
Paul Madsen e:
NTT p:613-482-0432
Co-Chair, Technology Expert Group m:613-302-1428
Liberty Alliance Project aim:PaulMdsn5
