Re: [security-services] Comments: sstc-saml1x-metadata-cd-01

On 6/28/06, Tom Scavo <> wrote:
> On 6/27/06, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
> > >
> > > [line 111] Why is <md:AffiliationDescriptor> precluded?
> >
> > It has zero meaning in SAML 1.1.
>
> I don't see why, but okay.

More importantly, any element having a type derived from
md:RoleDescriptorType is precluded.  This is an oversight, I think.
How about inserting the following text into the spec?

--------------------
Any element having a type derived from type md:RoleDescriptorType MUST
include at least one of the URIs urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:protocol
or urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:protocol in its
protocolSupportEnumeration XML attribute.
--------------------

This includes not only the predefined role descriptors in [SAMLMeta]
but any extended role descriptor as well (such as the role descriptors
defined in the SAML Metadata Extension for Query Requesters).

Tom