Okay, I've moved it up my stack. I'll try to push it forward during
the next two weeks.
Eve
wrote:
> I second that Scott (though I'm not a voting member:-).
>
> The folks who are reading the Tech Overview are typically new to SAML v2.0
> and some of the errors may be lost on them in any event.
>
> But as we edge closer to implementation, the importance of the errata doc is
> getting higher.
>
> Cheers
> Colin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 6:55 a.m.
> To: ; 'OASIS SSTC'
> Subject: RE: [security-services] SAML references
>
>> That's not true anymore -- all the SAML V2.0 docs, including the
>> individual schema files, are in docs.oasis-open.org and are intended
>> to be totally persistent. But we only get those URLs once the files
>> are OASIS Standard level, I think, so it's after the fact somewhat.
>
> Right, I was referring mainly to the Kavi links.
>
>> In all seriousness, actually, I would rank them this way; let me know
>> if anyone disagrees:
>>
>> Help get Tech Overview revision published Revise SSTC site Create (and
>> maintain) spec template Redline errata draft
>
> I can only speak for myself, I think the redline is vastly more important
> than the rest. I am fully willing to help, and I'll particularly volunteer
> to help maintain it going forward, I just don't have the cycles to take it
> all on from scratch.
>
> -- Scott
--
Eve Maler +1 425 947 4522
Technology Director eve.maler @ sun.com
CTO Business Alliances group Sun Microsystems, Inc.
