RE: [security-services] errata: misuse of strongly matches

> but the definition of strongly matches in section 3.3.4 does not
> relate Subjects to NameIDs, it relates Subjects to Subjects, so the
> above statement makes no sense.  The same is true of lines 1299--1301
> of SAMLProf.

"No sense" seems a bit strong. Obviously, the meaning was that the
identifier in the assertion Subject is identical to the one in the message.

-- Scott