Re: [security-services] Tech Overview outstanding issues

On 10/11/06, Tom Scavo <> wrote:
>
> I just noticed section 4.1.3 outlines post-artifact, not
> redirect-artifact.  Let me whip up another example for that specific
> use case...
>
> Btw, did we agree on yesterday's call how to handle the transmission
> of the artifact in section 4.1.3?  (FWIW, I agree with RSP's inline
> comment that the artifact should bound to a redirect.)

Sorry for delay.  Please find attached three files:

saml2-sso-redirect-post.txt
saml2-sso-post-artifact.txt
saml2-sso-post-artifact2.txt

The first two files accompany sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3, respectively.
The third file is a slight variation on the second flow where the
artifact is transmitted to the SP via HTTP GET (instead of HTTP POST).

Tom Scavo
NCSA/University of Illinois