RE: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?

> But it seems pretty clear, from Section 8.3.1 of [SAMLCore] and from E60
> of the Approved Errata, that the correct URI should be:
> 
> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified

Yes, it is. If the format in 2.0 had the same meaning as the old, we left the URI alone.

-- Scott