> Ah, that may explain why the filename extension (.html/.xhtml) matters
> in your case. Does the output file have a DOCTYPE declaration?
Yes, it's valid XHTML according to the W3C. Valid doesn't mean usable.
> Note the 'doctype: loose' config parameter. I tried 'doctype: strict'
> but you don't even want to know how many validator errors that
> produced.
Well, I didn't get any errors, the SimpleTidy program gave me something
valid, just not always something readable.
I'll try the actual tidy code next time.
-- Scott
