← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [security-services] Comments on Tech Overview rev 13

From
Paul Madsen <>
Date
2007-07-19T13:32:03+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [security-services] Comments on Tech Overview rev 13
Finally getting to my graphic editing AI

The various sequence diagrams have some or all of the following message 
steps

- Access Resource
- Challenge for credentials
- User Login
- Supply resource

Was it the agreement that the first & last are to be drawn as solid 
lines? And the middle 2 as dotted?

Paul

Tom Scavo wrote:
> On 3/11/07, Eve L. Maler <> wrote:
>>
>> >> I personally don't think we need to hew to this rule.
>> >
>> > That's fine.  It's mostly pedagogical and not worth quibbling about in
>> > general.  I personally find this to be a useful rule when writing
>> > documentation and so forth since it leads to reasonably complete
>> > end-to-end flows that novices can understand.
>>
>> I'm game to change it -- if Paul feels like doing the graphic
>> editing!  But I don't feel it's absolutely essential unless
>> something thinks we're making it more confusing this way.
>
> I'm okay with the single "swoopy arrow" :-) but did we agree that
> steps 1 and 7 should be represented by a solid line?  That's my main
> concern.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>

-- 
Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
NTT                     p:613-482-0432
                        m:613-302-1428
                        aim:PaulMdsn5
                        web:connectid.blogspot.com
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread