On 9/25/07, Hal Lockhart <> wrote:
>
> 3.2 Docs pending public review
>
> Pending 15 Day Review
> *SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based
> Systems (CD 04)
>
> The following are needed.
>
> 1. The dates of the original 60-day review, including a link to the
> announcement
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200605/msg00001.html
> 2. The comment resolution log of any reported issues
>
> 3. A change-marked copy of the spec noting the differences from the
> version submitted for the 60-day public review.
This document went through five (5) working drafts between CD-02 and
CD-03, so a diff would be meaningless. I wonder if we should we
submit this document for 60-day public review instead of 15-day public
review?
The wiki has been updated with more information about this document:
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSamlX509AuthnAttribProfile
> Pending 60 Day Review
> *SAML V2.0 Deployment Profiles for X.509 Subjects (CD 02)
>
> Need work on conformance sections:
>
> SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based
> Systems - contains no conformance section
Yes it does. Please see section 5 of CD-02:
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSaml2X509ProfilesDeploy
Thanks,
Tom
