RE: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall, September 25, 2007

I am also at the workshop, but intend to chair the call anyway. Perhaps
we can find a quiet spot.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:37 AM
> To: 
> Subject: RE: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall,
September
> 25, 2007
> 
> I'm going to be at the XMLSig workship, so will miss the call.
> 
> > SAMLv2.0 HTTP POST "SimpleSign" Binding - contains an inadequate
> > conformance
> > section:
> > "A specification that is approved by the TC at the Public Review
Draft,
> > Committee Specification or OASIS Standard level must include a
separate
> > section, listing a set of numbered conformance clauses, to which any
> > implementation of the specification must adhere in order to claim
> > conformance to the specification (or any optional portion thereof)."
> 
> Given that there is no indication of what was wrong with it...I'm not
> clear
> on what I'm being asked to write.
> 
> Is there an example somewhere? This is one document, one set of rules,
> it's
> all or nothing. I didn't know how to write it to satisfy them, so I'd
> suggest perhaps somebody who does supply the text.
> 
> -- Scott
>