agree with Scott re document URLs.
I spent more time trying to work out what to put for the various URLs
than for the actual editing of the latest Tech Overview
paul
Scott Cantor wrote:
> It looks like at least one convention being used for self-contained
> documents is to put conformance into a subsection in section 1 of the
> document, after the references. I guess this way you can state it up front
> and cover anything described in the rest of the document, so that's
> reasonable, I guess.
>
> I'm working on the next LDAP attribute profile working draft now, and then
> I'll change the rejected document(s) I submitted before to follow that
> approach.
>
> I would also like to get some kind of closure on the issue of where our
> documents are going to live. Having all these broken/non-working URLs in the
> header of our specs just looks bad IMHO. What we had before with a generic
> reference to the SSTC site was better than that.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
>
>
--
Paul Madsen e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
NTT p:613-482-0432
m:613-302-1428
aim:PaulMdsn5
web:connectid.blogspot.com
