> For what it's worth, an important distinction between the OASIS SAML
> wiki and saml.xml.org is who has access. AFAIK, the SAML wiki is open
> only to SSTC members while saml.xml.org is open to anyone. That's
> what I've been using to decide where to place content. That and the
> fact that saml.xml.org is being promoted as a SAML product and service
> directory.
I agree. My point wasn't to not use the saml.org wiki, it's to *stop* using
the other one. The documents you mentioned are exactly what should be on
saml.org, not internal.
-- Scott
