Re: [security-services] what's an "assertion profile"?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
>> Except for lines 228--233 (which will be removed in the next draft), I
>> think I did that.  What remains is non-normative discussion (in the
>> Background section, mainly) that provides needed context.
>
> My opinion is that context isn't needed and is confusing and
> counter-productive. Without providing actual processing rules, which can't
> be anything but abstract and generally overly constraining, I don't think it
> helps.

Well, that's seems pretty drastic but I'll take it under advisement.
I'll have to see if what remains actually makes sense.

If others have comments along these lines, I'd like to hear them.

Thanks,
Tom