On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
>
> The relevant distinctions tend to be more about the difference (if any)
> between the relying party and the requester.
>
> As an example, there's no good reason why a profile has to address whether
> one user can request a token to act as another. That's policy. The messages
> would be the same (structurally) in either case.
I'm not following you, Scott. In draft-02, I'm assuming that the
presenter is the subject. This covers Nate's profile and the
nonbrowser use case I have in mind. Can you give an example of a use
case that does not involve the subject but still utilizes
holder-of-key? Are you referring to the delegation issue that Eve
raised earlier?
Thanks,
Tom
