On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
>
>> So why not characterize it as such? Is what you've
>> written a SAML V2.0 Metadata Interoperability Profile for Web Browser
>> SSO?
>
> There's nothing in it that has any dependency on the profile(s) being
> implemented. It is exactly what the title says...*a* profile for metadata
> interoperability (as opposed to the "only" profile for that, though it's the
> only one I've ever seen).
>
> Anyway, at this particular moment, I haven't come up with any good alternate
> names that don't sound awkward, so rather than waste my time on it, I'll
> leave the floor open. But I would object to something with "higher ed" in
> it, because this isn't specific to one community. The title should reflect
> some technical aspect of the profile.
During yesterday's concall, you asked for suggested alternative
titles. I'll offer this one:
SAML V2.0 Metadata Profile for Web Browser SSO
Cheers,
Tom
