> I didn't think you'd like it but a poor response is better than no
> response in this case. I'm simply registering my desire for a better
> title.
As I said originally, the only sensible title other than this one would be
something that emphasizes the technical choices the profile makes. But I
haven't come up with anything that doesn't sound stupid or confusing.
Our implementation terminology uses or has used terms like "basic",
"explicit key", "inline", etc, but I don't think any of that works all that
well.
I considered suggesting something along the lines of "self-contained
metadata profile for trust management", but "self-contained" is wonky
sounding, and trust is usually a word people avoid.
-- Scott
