On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Nate Klingenstein <> wrote:
>
>> The SAML wiki provides a fairly good version history (or at least it
>> contains the information required to construct one easily).
>
> Maybe pointing at the Wiki would be better, then.
That's a different approach but I don't see why not. What's the best
way to sneak this link into the document, I wonder?
> It lacks my comments that
> I've been adding with revisions, but those would only take a few moments to
> copy over.
That would be an advantage over an inline version history, in fact.
Thanks,
Tom
