RE: [security-services] disposition of the HoK profiles

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2009-07-05T22:19:39+00:00
ID
048501c9fdbe$ab925f80$02b71e80$@
Thread
RE: [security-services] disposition of the HoK profiles
Tom Scavo wrote on 2009-07-05:
> My earlier argument for an implementer of the HoK Web Browser SSO
> Profile is an example---you do nothing.  The HoK Web Browser SSO
> Profile can forever and always depend on CS-01 of the HoK Assertion
> Profile.  It doesn't matter what changes are subsequently made in
> CS-02 of the latter.

Right, but by implication I have to process the confirmation method wthin
the context of the dependent profile, and not in a sharable component that
might be applicable to others.

Not saying that's a big problem, but I was trying to explain what I thought
the drawback was.

-- Scott