Re: [security-services] disposition of the HoK profiles

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Scott Cantor<> wrote:
>
> To be clear, based on what I know of the intentions here, I *don't* think
> adding some kind of Kerberos-based language here is necessarily going to
> change the existing language in a way that renders it somehow fundamentally
> incompatible. I was mainly trying to say "if possible, let's keep it that
> way".

I certainly agree with that, and after discussing this with Nate and
Josh, I think this is doable.  That's why going to CS now doesn't seem
like such a big deal.

Tom