RE: [security-services] work product review

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2009-10-28T03:04:43+00:00
ID
00ab01ca577b$566f0230$034d0690$@
Thread
RE: [security-services] work product review
Scott Cantor wrote on 2009-10-27:
> I have no idea what was or wasn't in the review notice. The schema is
inside
> the document as well as in its own file, like all the SAML documents have
> done. The rules changed and the schema file can be the normative one now.

Correcting myself slightly, the entire schema isn't actually reproduced in
the document (just the guts, no <schema> header/footer). The stand-alone
schema was always the normative one in any case.

-- Scott