Re: [security-services] Call for a volunteer: Missing CS Versionof Text-based Challenge Response

Hi Tom,
   I have done that too: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/35171/sstc-saml-text-based-challenge-response-authn-context-class-cs-01.html

Additionally, I updated the wiki: 
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/TextChallengeResponse#preview

Regards,
Anil

On 11/11/2009 05:42 PM, Thomas Scavo wrote:
> Anil, I think you want to create an HTML version of this document as well. This is easily done (if the ODT is not too complicated) from within OpenOffice. Give it a try and let me know what happens.
>
> Tom
>
> ----- "Anil Saldhana"<>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Hi,
>>     I have uploaded a .odt and .pdf versions of the CS version of
>> this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anil
>>
>> On 10/27/2009 05:46 PM, Thomas Scavo wrote:
>>      
>>> ----- "Anil Saldhana"<>   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>>      can you give me the pointer to the text based draft of the
>>>>          
>> spec?
>>      
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> I suspect Hal is referring to this spec (whose link is on the front
>>>        
>> page of the SAML wiki):
>>      
>>> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/TextChallengeResponse
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 09/21/2009 10:34 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Harold Lockhart wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> In the process of reviewing the work done in the TC since 2.0, I
>>>>>> noticed that while the Text-Based
>>>>>> Challenge/Response Token Authentication Context Class spec was
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>> voted
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> to CS on May 23, 2007, only the CD form is in the repository. (I
>>>>>>              
>> am
>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> sure others were aware of this, but it had escaped my notice.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since the editors of this spec are no longer active in the TC, I
>>>>>>              
>> am
>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> asking if there is a volunteer who could create a committee
>>>>>> specification form of this document. Although the spec does not
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>> meet
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> current TC Process rules, it is grandfathered, so the content
>>>>>>              
>> does
>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> not need to be (and in fact cannot be) modified. Only the header
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> date need to be fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anyone who has time to do this?