RE: [security-services] Discovery hint

Josh Howlett wrote on 2010-02-07:
> FWIW, I finally opted for this model. However, SAML2Meta states that
> "Extension elements MUST be namespace-qualified by a non-SAML-defined
> namespace". How should I resolve this, given that the namespace for
> the discovery hint will be a SAML-defined namespace? Is it ok to make
> this element a child of <RoleDescriptor>?

Non-SAML-defined means "not defined in the original standard", and even that
wording is probably wrong, we really meant "unless we define it".

-- Scott