Re: Starter Documents for SAML Version 2.1

From
Paul Knight <>
Date
2012-09-14T17:23:44+00:00
ID
CADgeAH8y2=
Thread
Re: Starter Documents for SAML Version 2.1
Hi Scott,

I'll be happy to prepare the docs with two-digit numbering..It will help the parts appear in order in file listings, etc.

(Instead of:

part1

part10

part2

part3

...)

No need to submit additional request form(s).

Should be back to you a bit later today...

Best regards,

Paul

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Cantor, Scott <> wrote:

On 9/14/12 1:10 PM, "Paul Knight" <> wrote:

>

>I think it would be acceptable to renumber the Working Drafts before they

>are published as a Committee Specification Draft (CSD), but we wouldn't

>want to renumber after the initial publication.  Additional parts could

>be added (with incremental numbers),

> but it would be very problematic to alter the existing part numbers

>after publication.

I figured.

>It sounds as though we might want to at least modify the initial

>documents to use a two-digit numbering scheme (part01, part02, etc.).

>Please let me know if you want to do this.

I think that would be wise just in case if you want to use a fixed width

for the number.

>Renumbering is not very easy, since the Parts contain references to each

>other, as well as having metadata elements (document properties),

>footers, and front page formatting keyed to the Part number. It would be

>best to have it planned out as much as possible

> before going far...  I'll be happy to produce a different set of starter

>documents if needed.

Our problem is we aren't far enough into the process to know yet, and when

we did it originally, we didn't have numbered documents.

I don't mind having to adjust the metadata in the event I have to renumber.

Should I fill out a new ticket to request the two digit numbering or can

you take care of that?

>It's fine to have varying WD numbers submitted together, to be published

>as a single CSD with a common CSD number. It will be really important to

>get all the parts together into a single ZIP file (including all schemas,

>etc.) and have the TC vote on the

> ZIP file as a whole.

>

Yes, we did that originally, that's nothing new.

>You're welcome...  and I'll be happy to prepare a modified set if needed.

Thanks.

-- Scott

-- 
Paul Knight  - Tel: +1 781-861-1013

OASIS - Advancing open standards for the information society
Document Process Analyst