RE: [security-services] SAML 2.1 Protocol Reorg Idea

From
La Joie, Chad <>
Date
2013-01-02T15:49:52+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] SAML 2.1 Protocol Reorg Idea
Well, I was looking for some specifics.  I could not find any processing rules in the Core document that wasn't a subsection of a specific protocol section (i.e., I didn't see any general processing rules).

As for the bindings.  For now I just assumed they would remain in a separate document.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  [mailto:security-
> ] On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:45 AM
> To: La Joie, Chad; OASIS SSTC ()
> Subject: Re: [security-services] SAML 2.1 Protocol Reorg Idea
> 
> On 1/2/13 10:42 AM, "La Joie, Chad" <> wrote:
> 
> >What material would be duplicated?
> 
> Processing rules and syntax. Anything you're pulling in from core or bindings
> (and some of metadata) is something that will be dupliacted across some set
> of documents targeting different use cases or profiles.
> 
> Every bit you factor out as common or "base" just creates the same division
> that exists now.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>