Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: SAML 2.1 Profile Documents
Yeah, I think that's what I meant when I said "SP initiated SSO" > -----Original Message----- > From: Cantor, Scott [mailto:] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:53 PM > To: La Joie, Chad; OASIS SSTC () > Subject: RE: SAML 2.1 Profile Documents > > > Okay, much later than what I wanted, here's my first round of > > suggestions for the new 2.1 profile documents. The goal is to lump > > together like items in a way that an implementer could pick up one > > profile and implement it without ever needing to refer to the others > > (unless they need those functions too, of course). > > > > Single Sing On > > Covers browser basic web SSO, ECP, and SP initiated SSO > > I might argue for adding the Request Initiation profile to that, or possibly to > the Discovery document (it sort of relates in that it circumvents use of > discovery). > > > Discovery > > Covers 2.0 profile document section 4.3 and IdP Discovery Profile > > -- Scott > >
Next in thread →
Next in month →