On 6/24/13 8:25 AM, "La Joie, Chad" <> wrote:
>Docs corresponding to ones we have today:
>authn context
>bindings
>conformance
>core
>glossary
>metadata
Security and Privacy Considerations
>Attributes (should the xacml profile be moved out in favor of moving it
>into the XACML/SAML binding document?)
That isn't ours though, so the XACML TC would have to agree to pick that
up.
>Anything that you guys can think of that is missing? Any others that
>should be combined or split apart in order to improve readability?
I suspect having some material about practical use of AuthnContext in the
Single Sign On document would be useful. If we can agree what practical
means.
-- Scott
