> In fact, I would prefer the option that you suggested, to have a req-
> attr:RequestedAttributes wrapper over a list of md:RequestAttribute, but
> one of the comments previously received made me think this is against the
> SAML specification:
>
> „SAML extension elements MUST be namespace-qualified in a non-SAML-
> defined namespace“ as of sstc-saml-core-errata-2.0-wd-07 line 1566."
The extension element in this case is the wrapper, not what's inside it.
> Could you please confirm if this would actually be compliant? If yes, I will
> modify my proposal accordingly.
It's compliant.
-- Scott
