Re: [security-services] Draft on new subject identifiers

> Am 11.09.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Cantor, Scott <>:
> 
> On 9/11/17, 3:41 PM, "Rainer Hoerbe" <> wrote:
> 
>> It might make sense to include some guidance for deployments that do use SSO. Otherwise LGTM.
> 
> What kind of guidance are you thinking of? (Also, I don't know what the LGTM acronym expands to…)

If a response contains a pairwise-id, would you recommend to include a transient nameid to support SLO?

LGTM: looking good to me:-)