On 8/21/20, 9:21 AM, " on behalf of Leif Johansson" < on behalf of > wrote:
> Looking at the information model I think we might need its not clear that it is just an attribute.
Generally speaking though...
- AttributeValue is an open content model
- anything that's not a simple-ish content model is likely to get botched or ignored anyway
- if it isn't simple, at least existing code bases that aren't lazy already support open content in AttributeValue
I'm not making a blanket statement, just speaking generally that I tend toward trying to reuse the extension then defining new ones, simply to save time and to leverage existing configuration machinery.
-- Scott
