Do you think we need an ontology pattern?
:)
-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:52 AM
To: Marc Adlam; ; ;
; ;
;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] Anti-Blueprints - Number of services
Marc wrote:
"What I've noticed on this TC so far is that we struggle with semantics in a way that's similar to what first-time SOA implementers face. We are looking for standard definitions, e.g., give me one standard definition of a service, one standard definition for SOA, etc., so I can document my patterns in a consistent manner. I see organizations adopting SOA who are trying to solve these semantic problems as well: one definition for order, one for customer, etc. Short-term, we in the Blueprints TC have agreed to look to SOA-RM for standard definitions, and I see that as a welcome development. Patterns and semantics should enjoy a separation of concerns."
+ 1
C'est notre raison d'皻re (it is our reason for being)
Duane
