West coast for me, but I'd suggest that participation level be a
weighting factor in the decision.
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Flinn [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:05 AM
To: Michael Stiefel
Cc: ;
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] Joined the tc for...
With similar budget constraints, I would also vote for the East Cost.
Don
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 08:51 -0500, Michael Stiefel wrote:
> I have a restricted travel budget at the moment, so the East Coast
would be
> best for me right now.
>
> Michael
>
> At 07:56 AM 1/31/2006, Miko Matsumura wrote:
> >So where and when would work for an F2F?
> >
> >As I mentioned in the last call, I think this would be helpful in
order to
> >get the people some social interaction to get the working styles and
some
> >of the more practical aspects of interacting across a broadly
distributed
> >group.
> >
> >We will likely not be able to assemble everyone, as it's a pretty big
group--
> >
> >How about March? What would be the easiest location for people? Is
anyone
> >planning to go to the SOA Executive Forum in San Francisco in March
> >(Infoworld event)? Other suggestions?
> >
> >Best,
> >Miko
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Laskey [mailto:]
> > Sent: Thu 1/26/2006 11:23 AM
> > To: Beack, Theo; ;
> >
> > Cc:
> > Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] Joined the tc for...
> >
> >
> >
> > Reading Theo's motivation, a side issue comes to mind that I
want to
> > raise but not necessarily intend we resolve at this moment.
> >
> > Theo notes the need for "detailed and practical examples".
What
> > level of validation or other pedigree MUST (or at least
SHOULD) we
> > provide with any examples to convince our audience that this
is more
> > than Powerpoint engineering? Many SDOs require several
independent
> > implementations of their specs or parts thereof to get their
> > respective standards label. Do we need to do that or
something
> > analogous to it?
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > P.S. For why I joined, I am interested to see what a
blueprint is,
> > what tangible purpose it serves, and to make sure any
deliverable of
> > the TC reflects (or at least considers) the real needs I see
for my
> > sponsors/end-users.
> >
> > At 08:41 PM 1/25/2006, Beack, Theo wrote:
> > >I joined because I saw an urgent need within the user
community for
> > >guidance on how to implement SOA. Organizations are trying
to
> > come to
> > >grips with SOA and many architects (and developers) are
looking for
> > >detailed and practical examples on how to architect their
SOA
> > >architectures as well as how to solve specific business and
> > technical
> > >problems using SOA principles. Most developers "code by
> > example". I saw
> > >the adoption blueprints as a way for architects to
"architect by
> > >example".
> > >
> > >I joined in the hope that this TC would help the user
community by
> > >providing well thought through and clearly documented
> > blueprints, which
> > >they could use as a reference on which they can base their
SOA
> > >implementations.
> > >
> > >I also joined to contribute to these adoption blueprints by
> > sharing my
> > >knowledge and experience.
> > >
> > >Theo
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From:
[mailto:]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 09:57
> > >To:
> > >Subject: [soa-blueprints] Joined the tc for...
> > >
> > >
> > >Each of use joined the TC for some reason what was it
exactly?
> > >
> > >What did each of you expect to get or contribute from it?
> > >
> > >This is the real question it seems.
> > >
> > >- dan
> >
> > --
> >
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> > / Ken
> > Laskey
> > \
> > | MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
|
> > | 7515 Colshire
> > Drive fax: 703-983-1379 |
> > \ McLean VA
> > 22102-7508 /
> >
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail:
http://flintsecurity.com
