Wes and Frank
I would be happy to defer to your judgment, however, we have to remember
that there is the conflicting goal of moving ahead. I presume that you
both think that on balance the best approach is to do the re-write. Is
that a correct assumption?
Duane and Matt please jump in on this conversation with your words of
wisdom.
Don
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 11:57 -0400, wrote:
> I agree with Frank as I will be doing the same.
>
> Wes
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francis McCabe [mailto:]
> Sent: June 9, 2005 11:56 AM
> To: Don Flinn
> Cc: soa-rm-editors
> Subject: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions
>
> Actually, I have a different suggestion.
>
> I would propose a complete redraft of my section(s), incorporating
> the suggestions, and a few additional ones.
>
> It is easier for me, and I think easier for the group, to see a
> coherent picture. Of course, I would then also need to show how the
> issues have been approached.
>
> I have been putting this off a little, but I think that this is the
> best course of action to respond to the comments.
>
> Frank
>
> On Jun 8, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Don Flinn wrote:
>
> > Frank
> >
> > Could you put your response to Issue 7-28 into another document and
> > upload a documents containing the PD to
> > Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page?
> >
> > I will then hyperlink it in the issues list. Yes, more
> > bureaucracy, but
> > I need some control. Appreciate your help.
> >
> > Don
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:49 -0700, Francis McCabe wrote:
> >
> >> Bullets -- agreed
> >>
> > --
> > Don Flinn
> > President, Flint Security LLC
> > Tel: 781-856-7230
> > Fax: 781-631-7693
> > e-mail:
> > http://flintsecurity.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
--
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail:
http://flintsecurity.com
