I trust the editors to come up with a workable recommendation and solution.
Duane
Don Flinn wrote:
>Wes and Frank
>
>I would be happy to defer to your judgment, however, we have to remember
>that there is the conflicting goal of moving ahead. I presume that you
>both think that on balance the best approach is to do the re-write. Is
>that a correct assumption?
>
>Duane and Matt please jump in on this conversation with your words of
>wisdom.
>
>Don
>
>On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 11:57 -0400, wrote:
>
>
>>I agree with Frank as I will be doing the same.
>>
>>Wes
>> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Francis McCabe [mailto:]
>>Sent: June 9, 2005 11:56 AM
>>To: Don Flinn
>>Cc: soa-rm-editors
>>Subject: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions
>>
>>Actually, I have a different suggestion.
>>
>>I would propose a complete redraft of my section(s), incorporating
>>the suggestions, and a few additional ones.
>>
>>It is easier for me, and I think easier for the group, to see a
>>coherent picture. Of course, I would then also need to show how the
>>issues have been approached.
>>
>>I have been putting this off a little, but I think that this is the
>>best course of action to respond to the comments.
>>
>>Frank
>>
>>On Jun 8, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Don Flinn wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Frank
>>>
>>>Could you put your response to Issue 7-28 into another document and
>>>upload a documents containing the PD to
>>>Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page?
>>>
>>>I will then hyperlink it in the issues list. Yes, more
>>>bureaucracy, but
>>>I need some control. Appreciate your help.
>>>
>>>Don
>>>
>>>On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:49 -0700, Francis McCabe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bullets -- agreed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Don Flinn
>>>President, Flint Security LLC
>>>Tel: 781-856-7230
>>>Fax: 781-631-7693
>>>e-mail:
>>>http://flintsecurity.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
