RE: [tab-askthetab] First Cut on Profiles

From
Martin Chapman <>
Date
2009-01-13T18:13:07+00:00
ID
00fc01c975aa$860ed960$922c8c20$@
Thread
RE: [tab-askthetab] First Cut on Profiles
We might have be careful not to over think this issue. IMHO within
an OASIS context a profile is one of two things:

 

1.      A separate
specification in its own right that modifies conformance requirements of one or
more other specifications.

2.      A
distinct conformance point within a specification that modifies another
conformance point in the same specification.

 

 

 

From: Durand, Jacques R.
[mailto:] 

Sent: 13 January 2009 00:50

To: Patrick Durusau; 

Subject: RE: [tab-askthetab] First Cut on Profiles

 

Inline <JD>,

-jacques

-----Original Message-----

From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:]

Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:42 AM

To: 

Subject: [tab-askthetab] First Cut on Profiles

Greetings!

Thinking about an appropriate response from the TAB to the question raised by
Rex Brooks.

As a first cut I would suggest:

1. Acknowledge that OASIS has no formal guidance on the "profile" issue

<JD> we first need to define which kind of profile we talk about:

(a) integration profiles (a-la-WSI)

(b) usage profile (or deployment profile), which is about a community of user
deciding of how to layer their own business practice on top of OASIS standards.
May contain [application] domain-specific info.

(c) COnformance profiles, whcih are more about defining a (set of)
conformance clause(s) that define precisely what are the requirements - and the
options - for a product that claims to conform to a spec.

2. Summarize the resources posted thus far, including those from
Robin (thanks Robin!).

<JD>
I made last year a presentation about the general "profiling"
activity, in EU. Will retrieve these slides.

Perhaps in the form of an annotated set of resources with the major issues
bulleted as a lead in?

Question: Given the complexity of the profile issue, do we need anything more
than some bright line stuff for the common cases (don't reuse names in a
namespace unless you are following the original definition)?

Having just skimmed most of the material that has been posted, I can readily
imagine having different opinions on successive days about profiling in
particular situations. I am not at all certain that beyond repeating the
considerations that have been outlined by others that there is a lot of new
ground to be covered. Perhaps after some experience has been gained using those
general profiling considerations I may feel differently but at the moment I am
not sure what more we could offer.

I am not sure how such matters get on the agenda for discussion/decision by the
TAB but I would be more than happy to draft some text that summarizes what I
think could be some bring line rules and pointers to other considerations that
could form the basis for an answer from the TAB.

<JD> we could add a "profiling" section to out TAB
wiki, as a collaborative space on this topic.

I am assuming that answers are expected in some relatively responsive time
frame.

Hope everyone is having a great weekend!

Patrick

--

Patrick Durusau



Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34

Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)

Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor,
ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php