RE: [tax] FW: Tax XML Data Elements

From
Sylvia Webb <>
Date
2007-01-11T04:18:04+00:00
ID
006301c73537$42b637e0$2f01a8c0@GEFEGUS
Thread
RE: [tax] FW: Tax XML Data Elements
Susan,

 

I can't speak about Tax XML data elements, but I am aware 
that the insurance industry XML data elements include the types of details being 
requested.  The schema are located at www.acord.org. They are free but permission will 
be needed to use any portion of the schema "as is".  Contact details for 
obtaining permission are included in each schema.

 

Sylvia Webb 
GEFEG 
US 
310-370-3410 - Voice
310-370-5614 - Fax 

www.gefeg.com -  
Internet 

From: Smoter Susan [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:30 AM
To: 

Subject: [tax] FW: Tax XML Data 
Elements

 

Would someone like to 
comment on this?

__________________________

Susan 
L. Smoter

Director, Internet 
Development Services

Electronic Tax 
Administration, IRS

www.irs.gov

From: Tom 
DeVilbiss [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 11:53 
PM
To: Smoter Susan
Subject: Tax XML Data 
Elements

 

You are 
listed as a Co-Chair on the OASIS Tax XML TC.

 

I'm 
retired and trying to build a little enthusiasm for an open 
source Genealogy. I've got a crazy idea that the industry (at least 
open source) could use the XML Taxonomy as database elements and save us all a 
lot of trouble later on when we strat finding the sharing opportunites between 
our ancestors and the public records they leave 
behind. 

 

Most of 
the elements that I've need so far have come from the Human 
Resources schema, but when I got onto a "graves project" I got stumped. 

 

Apparently the HR 
folks don't haven't defined an element for "deceased" or "Date Deceased" or 
other details dealing with an individual having expired. It occurred to me that 
these might well be elements that the Tax Administration task force might use. I 
was unable to find your poposed taxonomy on the Committee web site, so I 
thought I'd see if you might be able to help. These are not elements that are 
likely to cause controversy once identifiedvand there might be a straman out 
there some place...

 

First 
I'd like to thank you for recognizing and dealing with the importance of 
standardization and then thank you in advance for any advice/details you might 
be able to give me.

 

Tom 
DeVilbiss

Minot, ND 58701