Hi Carl, Hi Bernard....
<quote
who="Carl Mattocks">
>Acknowledged - the link is for OASIS members.
>
>Below is an extract from the
charter.
><charter-extract>
>The Semantic Content Management
SC was established by the OASIS ebXML...
</quote>
Unfortunately, the link is even for the TC
administrator only, not even OASIS members...
I would be interested in more detail, particularly
as there is always the danger of "scope creep": although there are plenty of
things that do need to be done, "our" TC is about Published Subjects, not about
semantic interoperability through public registration of ontologies and
ontological constructs...The SCMSC sounds closer to the "SeeBIG" TC
idea....
BTW: the OASIS members area doesn't show *any*
reference at all to SemConManSC of the ebXML Registry....???
<quote who="Patrick Durusau">
>
> What I am thinking is
that the definitions should be as generic to the
> general concept of PSIs
as possible so as to allow for future
> deliverables to address the needs
to topic maps and other technologies
> (or the development of deliverables
by other communities for their own
> purposes).
</quote>.
Is this not the tail wagging the
dog? Surely business drivers will lead to definition of general concepts and
requirements, and *then* such generic definitions can be "narrowed" to specific
TM implementations...?
Peter
Peter Brown
(formerly Pappamikail)
Head of Information Resources
Management
European Parliament
This mail reflects the views and opinions of the
author alone. Institutional affiliation is indicated for information purposes
only. Any formal correspondence on any matter contained within this mail should
be addressed to
