Thanks Paul.
I would add that on #2 below, that if incorporated, the digest algorithm should also be required.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lipton, Paul C [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 11:17 PM
To: Behrens, Michael V CTR (US);
Subject: RE: TOSCA feedback
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your comments. I acknowledge receipt of the below as TOSCA TC Co-Chair. Please be assured that the TC will carefully consider your comments.
Thanks again,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Behrens, Michael V CTR (US)
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 6:04 PM
To:
Subject: [tosca-comment] TOSCA feedback
Just a couple of quick comments:
1) I’d recommend that the metadata folder in the archive not be prefixed by the specification name. It should simple be "Metadata", either that or follow the Java and other archive examples: "META-INF".
2) I recommend that a digest value be standardized to allow the archive's integrity to be verified. We used this effectively in the OGF Application Content Services (ACS) specification: http://www.gridforum.org/documents/GFD.73.pdf
Michael Behrens
DISA GCCS-J I3, A3K55H
☎ 301-225-5076, cell: 571-594-3008
∴R2AD Email:
