Re: [ubl-lcsc] Eve's writeup on list containers

From
Eve L. Maler <>
Date
2002-09-09T15:56:13+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl-lcsc] Eve's writeup on list containers
Wow, I knew Bill would come up with a thoughtful response. :-) 
Unfortunately I don't have time right this second to read through it 
properly, but until I do that -- hopefully this afternoon -- I just 
wanted to point out that my point about list containers is the physical 
model is that they are *useful* (not *necessary*).  I gave an example of 
an XSLT template that demonstrates their optionality, but also 
demonstrates the conceptual awkwardness of their absence.

	Eve

Burcham, Bill wrote:
> I've summarized Eve's argument in outline form below to highlight which
> parts I agree with and which parts I dispute.  My arguments are mixed into
> the outline...
> 
> 1. list containers are necessary in the physical model (*DISPUTED*)

...

-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 883 5917
XML Web Services / Industry Initiatives      eve.maler @ sun.com