← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[ubl-lcsc] FW: representing integers, language
> Dear all > in looking at our facets Mavis and I have been considering how we can represent the different built in types by using representation terms. We are specifically concerned about integers, and language . Are there any ideas on this? > Should we generate some new secondary representation terms? > Language is easy to handle. We can define a secondary rep term called language type. However, integer is more problematic because the name itself is not a common business term. What should we define instead of integer? > > Regards > Gunther
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →