Re: [ubl-lcsc] [QA Team] LC Packaging Document (Was:Feedback onMethodology Paper)

The only thing I would suggest at this point is that we change the
name of the review package from "Part 2" to something like "UBL
Public Review: 13 January 2003" (with a change to "20 January
2003") in the version that gets publicly announced on that date).
Then "Part 1" and "Part 2" could be subsections within the HTML
doc at one level further down.