← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[ubl-lcsc] [QA Team] Email on comments 1.1 - 1.3
This apparently has already been out to the list once. ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- X-Unix-From: Mon Feb 10 19:06:54 2003 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:06:28 +0800 From: Tim McGrath <> Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] UBL - comment To: Robert Shmit <> Cc: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-AntiVirus: Reynolds Virus Scan OK. http://www.rts.com.au/policies/viruses/ X-ReynoldsPurgeDate: 1044932793 List-Owner: <mailto:> List-Post: <mailto:> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:?body=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:?body=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-lcsc/> List-Help: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/elists/admin.shtml>, <mailto:?body=help> List-Id: <ubl-lcsc.lists.oasis-open.org> X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000885 Thanks Robert - your comment is acknowledged and will be incorporated into our formal review. I hope you will be satisifed with our response. Robert Shmit wrote: >My comment about platform specific may have been a bit >strong. I agree with Jon B's comment here and reflects >the spirit of my concern. Just use XML. >Robert > > >--- Tim McGrath <> wrote: > > >>Can I just jump in with a procedural comment. >> >>I understood we had agreed to collate all comments >>and have the >>QA/editing team assemble them into topics that we >>would address after >>the close of the period. >> >>Are we jumping in to publicly debate each comment as >>it comes up? This >>is why we didn't ask for comments to go to the >>comment list. I would >>suggest we hold off publishing comments until we are >>ready to deal with >>them collectively. In the meantime, let the >>QA/Editing team deal with >>them and seek further clarification, etc if >>necessary. >> >>PS >>Robert, you are probably not aware of how ironic >>your comment was - >>hence our urge to share it! >> >>Jon Bosak wrote: >> >> >> >>>Robert Shmit's point -- that we should be using >>> >>> >>standard formats >> >> >>>for stylesheets and other documentation -- is well >>> >>> >>taken. When we >> >> >>>began the UBL effort there were no such standards, >>> >>> >>but with the >> >> >>>creation of openoffice -- a complete, free, >>> >>> >>open-source office >> >> >>>productivity suite that saves everything as XML -- >>> >>> >>and the >> >> >>>contribution of the openoffice XML formats to >>> >>> >>OASIS, there's >> >> >>>really no reason for continuing this practice. >>> >>>It's true, as Ken points out, that openoffice can >>> >>> >>open all the >> >> >>>.xls files without complaint, but that doesn't >>> >>> >>change the fact >> >> >>>that we're publishing an important part of our >>> >>> >>specifications >> >> >>>using a proprietary data format. As long as we >>> >>> >>persist in this >> >> >>>practice, we will be forever bound to make the open >>> >>> >>source suite >> >> >>>implement the proprietary format. Also, the fact >>> >>> >>that the >> >> >>>openoffice format is XML should make it easier (in >>> >>> >>principle) to >> >> >>>maintain the perl script used to generate the xsd. >>> >>>The OASIS eGov technical committee set the example >>> >>> >>I think we >> >> >>>should be following at its first meeting in >>> >>> >>Baltimore last month >> >> >>>when it decided that it would use only OASIS >>> >>> >>formats for its >> >> >>>papers and specifications. I think that we should >>> >>> >>adopt the same >> >> >>>policy. >>> >>>It seems to me that the 0p70 review cycle is the >>> >>> >>perfect >> >> >>>opportunity to get all of our formats over to >>> >>> >>openoffice before we >> >> >>>have to publish the next big release in May. We >>> >>> >>have to figure >> >> >>>out how to publish UBL Part 2 as a single document >>> >>> >>in this span >> >> >>>anyway, so we might as well make the changeover at >>> >>> >>the same time. >> >> >>>Let's talk about this some more when we meet in >>> >>> >>Denver Monday. >> >> >>>Jon >>> >>> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:29:10 -0500 >>> From: "G. Ken Holman" >>> >>> >><> >> >> >>> At 2003-01-28 09:13 -0800, Bill Meadows wrote: >>> >Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii >>> >Content-MD5: 2PPxAHIjM3zajJYVUbAwbw== >>> > >>> > I never thought I'd be accused of this... >>> >>> :{)} >>> >>> Not sure what he is complaining about: >>> >>> (1) - Open Office seems to open all .xls files >>> >>> >>without complaint >> >> >>> (2) - the schemas, instances and stylesheets are >>> >>> >>platform independent >> >> >>> (3) - the "ubl.bat" file (not that he needs to >>> >>> >>run it to use the library) >> >> >>> contains only one active line which is a Perl >>> >>> >>invocation, so could be >> >> >>> considered documentation rather than mandatory >>> >>> >>execution >> >> >>> (4) - my stylesheet rebuilding processes (linked >>> >>> >>from the deliverable) are >> >> >>> all in Python >>> >>> I don't see anything jump out at me as platform >>> >>> >>specific to warrant his >> >> >>> comment. >>> >>> ....................... Ken >>> >>> >>> >>---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the >>> >>> >>subscription >> >> >>>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>regards >>tim mcgrath >>fremantle western australia 6160 >>phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 >> >> >> >> >> > > >===== >Robert Shmit >Shmit Technologies LLC. > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. >http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > -- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →