Marion,
Being new to this group, I should probably introduce myself as someone
working mainly in eGovernment in the UK, including in procurement.
For (A), I have used the term "band" in the past. This is well-understood in
the UK.
For (B), "tax ratio" is mathematically accurate, but would "tax percentage"
be more intuitive? The problem with "ratio" is that it implies that a 10%
value would be expressed as "0.1".
Regards
Paul Spencer
Director, Boynings Consulting Ltd
XML Adviser to the Office of the e-Envoy
http://www.boynings.co.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
> Sent: 07 August 2003 21:57
> To:
> Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Rate and Ratio
>
>
> During one of Gunther's' presentations in Montreal, he was looking for a
> replacement for the word rate to distinguish between
> A. Rate as used in tax rate category
> b. Rate as used tax rate (percentage)
> c. Rate as used in rate of speed
>
> An alternative of "ratio" was offered, but I'm not sure this was resolved.
> The problem may be that we habitually use incorrect terms, especially
> within our domains. I looked around a bit and noticed that in
> mathematics,
> rate is used to compare two unlike units of measurement as in "kilometers
> per hour" and ratio is used for comparison of numbers of the same units of
> measure (gear ratio is 1:4). The units of a ratio are typically not
> expressed.
>
> A currency exchange is a comparison of two different units, so currency
> exchange rate would be accurate.
>
> A percentage seems to me to be a ratio. A tax of 10 percent would equate
> to a ratio of 1 to 10 dollars. Likewise with discounts.
>
> Does this make sense to you? Does it have a dramatic impact on business
> vocabularies?
>
>
>
> Marion A. Royal
> 202.208.4643 (Office)
> 202.302.4634 (Mobile)
>
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou
p.php
