Re: [ubl-lcsc] [code] ISO considering charging for commercial use of code lists

| Perhaps our answer is to ship UBL engaged with the placebo (which
| we were planning anyway) and not ship a stock (which we had
| thought we would do) and package the stylesheet I wrote as part of
| the deliverable.

Say...  This is XML...  So we don't have to design around the
assumption that all the fields are fixed length any more.

Why don't we just provide canonical lists of names?

This would also eliminate one of the adjunct data fields, yes?

Jon