Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [ubl-lcsc] [CCT]: draft-9-mod-2.xsd for review/comment

From
Stephen Green <>
Date
2003-09-10T06:15:02+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl-lcsc] [CCT]: draft-9-mod-2.xsd for review/comment
Two comments both of which I feel need NDR attention too, (this message cc'd to the NDR chairs)

NDR - please may this be added to the agenda for today's call or sent out to list:

1) After the LCSC call yesterday, I do notice that there are 3 or 4 codes in the CCT schema. I do agree that these should ideally be removed from here and added as codes to the ABIEs. This would simplify the codelist integration we are doing at the moment. Would NDR comment.

2) Why do we have currencyID and codeListVersionID as sole attributes for cct:AmountType? Has there been a removal from here of a code attribute? If so is it not now confusing to have an ID here - anyone without access to the documentation would ask: is the currencyID for the code name? or the code value? or should it be currencyCode?

All the best

Stephen Green
(in process of adding codelists to models)

>>> Chin Chee-Kai <> 10/09/03 05:43:09 >>>
For your further review/ comments please.

Thanks.



Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email:  
http://SoftML.Net/
Next in thread → Next in month →