Re: [ubl-ndrsc] MSXML and Parser List

At Monday, 12 November 2001, Doug Bunting <> wrote:

>Mike,
>
>I believe the action item I took was to test msXML with respect 
to its XML
>Schema conformance.  I haven't started on that but my tardiness 
is unrelated
>to the issue you raise.
>
>It's important that we make a rational choice when placing this 
parser on
>our priority list, deciding how much weight we want to give its 
feature set
>in our guidelines.  Am I correct in thinking you'd like msXML to be
>relatively high in the list?

Thanks for clarifying the action item.  Yes, I think msXML needs 
to be relatively high on the list.

-------------------------------------
Mike Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com




=end of email===