RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Schema Design Flow

Title: Schema Design Flow

Dave,

 

Right. We assumed 
the root element was outside the bounds of the diagram, but I can see we need to 
caveat.

 

Thanks,

Mark 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Carlson 
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:51 
PM
To: 'UBL Design Rules (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] 
Schema Design Flow

  
The diagram is helpful, thanks.  But one 
  nitpick, I don't see how the final branch "All local" can be possible.  
  You always need at least one global element to represent the document 
  root.  So an extreme case would be that the document root exposes the 
  instance namespace, but all child elements are written without a namespace 
  prefix (unqualified local elements).

  
 

  
Dave

  
    
----- Original Message ----- 

    
From: 
    CRAWFORD, 
    Mark 

    
To: 'UBL Design Rules (E-mail)' 
    

    
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:57 
    AM

    
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Schema Design 
    Flow

    

    
To all, 

    
I have noticed that as we 
    discuss the various features of schema, we seem to struggle at times to 
    remember which features are compatible, at least I know that I certainly 
    do.  To help me keep it all straight, I asked two of my developers - 
    Joe Chiusano and Jessica Glace - to put together a flowchart that shows all 
    the interdependencies of the various features.  Although they are still 
    just getting started on this, I wanted to share with you what they have done 
    so far since it seems to apply to our discussions, and may also be something 
    we want to put in our design document.

    
Mark 
    

    
<<SchemaDesignFlow.pdf>>