MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] [Fwd: FW: [oagis-users] UserArea Extensions forVersion 8.0]
From: "Eve L. Maler" <>
To: "Burcham, Bill" <>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:53:25 -0400
I would be concerned about putting wildcards everywhere. It would mean
that the vanilla UBL library would allow all kinds of junk, and XSD
validation would mean little. But there may be locations where we want
to use it strategically. (Eventually we'll need a rule about wildcard
usage anyway...)
Eve
Burcham, Bill wrote:
> When I look at that BOD extension example (below) I see an "open
> content" model (as described by Roger Costello in this ancient
> correspondence
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000JanMar/0159.html>and
> in part three of his eggcelent XML Schema Tutorial
> <http://www.xfront.com/xml-schema.html>). I think UBL should define an
> open content model, i.e. just about everywhere in a valid UBL document
> instance, it should be easy to hang elements from non-UBL namespaces.
> What do you think?
>
> -Bill
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
