← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[ubl-ndrsc] [Fwd: Re: [ubl-comment] To define propietary businessdocuments]

From
Eve Maler
Date
2002-07-01T08:40:00+00:00
ID
Thread
[ubl-ndrsc] [Fwd: Re: [ubl-comment] To define propietary businessdocuments]
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

ubl-ndrsc message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] [Fwd: Re: [ubl-comment] To define propietary businessdocuments]

From: "Eve L. Maler" <>

To: 

Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 08:41:10 -0400

Uh, I think I kind of gave Gunther/Mike a head start here on the 
"identifiers as properties" paper.  As we discussed, we really don't 
need a paper so much as something we can submit as a comment on CCTS. 
What do people think of this attempt to describe the problem space? 
(Here I also describe what I think UBL ought to do about it, but I don't 
describe what I think *CCTS* ought to do.)

	Eve
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →