MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] RE: [ubl-lcsc] Newest version of the OO-design positionpaper.
From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <>
To: "'Stuhec, Gunther'" <>,"'Gregory, Arofan'" <>,"''" <>,"''" <>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:12:56 -0400
Title: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Newest version of the OO-design position paper.
Hello,
Regarding CCTS
compliance: I don't recall anywhere in the CCTS v1.8 spec that mandates
the structure of XML documents in regard to Dictionary Entry Names (I could have
missed that detail, though). I believe that these are 2 separate and
distinct concepts.
In any event, I don't
believe the paper made a strong enough case for doing away with "good" (in my
opinion) structure principles (the container approach, as we call
it). Plus, I think it makes great sense to divide such documents into
high-level containers such as Header, Detail (or LineItem), and Summary, I
believe the arguments in the paper were weighted much too heavily on tools and
performance - and while always a valid concern, I don't believe that in this day
and age either should be a concern to this regard (that is, what "harm" will a
few additional containership tags do for performance). I would personally
like to see a much stronger case made for the proposed
approach.
Thanks for
listening.
Joe
**************************************************************************
Joseph M. Chiusano
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge
McLean, VA 22102
Email:
Tel: 571.633.7722
**************************************************************************
