MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-comment] Code list rules document
From: "Eve L. Maler" <>
To: Terry Schager <>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:11:20 -0400
Hello Terry,
I think Bill Burcham's response is correct: (1) UBL is absolutely
committed to avoiding maintenance of code lists owned by others, and (2)
though it need not appear in the instance, agency-identifying
information is provided by means of the code list schema module. So I
believe that the proposed rules do meet your criteria. Let us know if
you have any other comments or questions,
Eve
Terry Schager wrote:
> Eve,
>
> You might consider the approach a few of the X12 and old TDCC Code tables
> adopted where the code provided pointed you to an agency (like AIA, AIAG,
> GCA, UCC, etc.) The agencies themselves maintain the code lists and take
> care of subscription or some other form of dissemination. As long as the
> agency qualifier is included in what re two conditional elements, document
> integrity is maintained. This benefits UBL because a code qualifier for a
> value is provided and it benefits the companies in a vertical industry
> because they are using codes they see relevance in (and are probably using
> already in back end apps or their EDI processing. Thoughts?
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 883 5917
XML Web Services / Industry Initiatives eve.maler @ sun.com
